1 The retractions came only months after BioMed Central.

Though many editors dislike this practice Even, it is used frequently, for a number of reasons. One can be that in specialized fields, authors may be best qualified to suggest suitable reviewers for the manuscript and topic involved. Another is certainly that it makes life less difficult for editors: finding suitable peer reviewers who are willing to review regularly can be both tough and time consuming. A third reason could be that journals and publishers are multinational increasingly. Previously, the editor and editorial table of a journal understood both the scientific field it protected and the people employed in it, but it’s almost impossible to be sufficiently well connected when both editors and submissions result from all over the world.‘It’s something that needs to be particularly studied, but we assume it’s probably a similar circumstance among gay and bisexual men,’ he said. Meanwhile, Aaron Blashill, author of an editorial that accompanied the scholarly study, described the current effort simply because both ‘novel and highly significant.’ ‘There currently aren’t any known open public health interventions targeting tanning or epidermis cancer tumor among these sexual minorities,’ noted Blashill, who is an assistant professor in the division of psychology at San Diego State University. ‘So, one main implication from this research is that it’ll hopefully encourage researchers to help expand study this population to better understand what will be the factors that are placing sexual minority guys at an increased risk for skin cancer.